Post by matt on Jun 30, 2010 6:52:05 GMT -5
THERE ARE VARIOUS OPINIONS ABOUT THE DIRECTION THAT IT WILL GO IN THE FUTURE.
THE MOST FAMOUS ARTICLE ABOUT THIS IS
"IT DOESN'T MATTER" BY NICHOLOS CARR MAY 2003, HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW
www.nicholasgcarr.com/articles/matter.html
A sequel to this article, titled The End of Corporate Computing, appears in the Spring 2005 issue of the MIT Sloan Management Review.
www.nicholasgcarr.com/articlesmt/archives/endofcorporatecomputing.shtml
AND FINALLY, In a May 16 rebuttal to Nicholas Carr's article, Computerworld columnist Frank Hayes rushes to the defense of "scattered, wasteful computing."
"NO END IN SITE"
www.computerworld.com/s/article/101705/Opinion_No_End_in_Sight?taxonomyId=014
"A SPIRITED DEFENSE OF WASTE"
www.roughtype.com/archives/2005/05/a_spirited_defe.php
THE MOST FAMOUS ARTICLE ABOUT THIS IS
"IT DOESN'T MATTER" BY NICHOLOS CARR MAY 2003, HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW
www.nicholasgcarr.com/articles/matter.html
A sequel to this article, titled The End of Corporate Computing, appears in the Spring 2005 issue of the MIT Sloan Management Review.
www.nicholasgcarr.com/articlesmt/archives/endofcorporatecomputing.shtml
AND FINALLY, In a May 16 rebuttal to Nicholas Carr's article, Computerworld columnist Frank Hayes rushes to the defense of "scattered, wasteful computing."
"NO END IN SITE"
www.computerworld.com/s/article/101705/Opinion_No_End_in_Sight?taxonomyId=014
"A SPIRITED DEFENSE OF WASTE"
www.roughtype.com/archives/2005/05/a_spirited_defe.php